Plain language summary
Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at an increased risk of complications during pregnancy and type 2 diabetes, pancreatic cancer, and heart disease after pregnancy. There is some controversy over the research surrounding current treatments of GDM and as such new treatment strategies are being researched and developed. Amongst these is the possibility of using probiotics and synbiotics to alleviate the driving factors of GDM, however the research is inconclusive as some studies have shown a benefit whereas others have not. This meta-analysis of 11 randomised control trials (RCTs) containing 779 participants aimed to determine the effect of probiotic/synbiotics on sugar and lipid levels in the blood. The results showed that amongst 8 of the RCTs, Lactobacillus was the most researched probiotic gut bacteria, with 6 species researched. In addition, Bifidobacterium bifidum and Streptococcus thermophilus were also used as a probiotic. 3 RCTs looked at synbiotics including 5 Lactobacillus species and 3 Bifidobacterium species. Supplementation with probiotics/synbiotics significantly improved blood sugar levels, measures of insulin resistance, and total cholesterol in pregnant women with GDM. Other blood lipids such as triglycerides, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, weight at the end of the trial, and weight gain during pregnancy were unaffected by supplementation. It was concluded that probiotics/synbiotics are of benefit to women with GDM especially if they contain L. acidophilus and B. bifidum. However, there may be more research required to better inform GDM management. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the gut microbiota may have a pivotal role in GDM. More research is required before this forms part of a regular management strategy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is prevalent with lasting health implications for the mother and offspring. Medical therapy is the foundation of GDM management, for achieving optimal glycemic control often requires treatment with insulin or metformin. Gut dysbiosis is a feature of GDM pregnancies, therefore, dietary manipulation of the gut microbiota may offer a new avenue for management. Probiotics are a relatively new intervention, which can reduce the mother's blood sugar levels and, furthermore, adjust glucose and lipid metabolism in both mother and offspring. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the effect of probiotics/synbiotics on glucose and lipid metabolism in women with GDM. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted using the electronic databases Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and EBOSCO, published between 1 January 2012 and 1 November 2022. A total of 11 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were analyzed. The indicators included fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting serum insulin (FSI), the homoeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), total cholesterol (TC), HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides (TG), the mean weight at end of trial, and gestational weight gain (GWG). RESULTS Compared with the placebo, probiotics/synbiotics were associated with a statistically significant improvement in FPG (MD = -2.33, 95% CI = -4.27, -0.40, p = 0.02), FSI (MD = -2.47 95% CI = -3.82, -1.12, p = 0.0003), HOMA-IR (MD = -0.40, 95% CI = -0.74, -0.06, p = 0.02), and TC (MD = -6.59, 95% CI = -12.23,--0.95, p = 0.02), while other factors had no significant difference. The subgroup analysis revealed that the kind of supplement led to heterogeneity for FPG and FSI, while heterogeneity was not found for others. CONCLUSION Probiotics/synbiotics could control glucose and lipid metabolism in pregnant women with GDM. There was a significant improvement in FPG, FSI, HOMA-IR, and TC. The use of specific probiotic supplementation may be a promising prevention and therapeutic strategy for GDM. However, due to the heterogeneity among existing studies, further studies are warranted to address the limitations of existing evidence and better inform the management of GDM.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
